Unite against abuse of power and authority!

Select your language

Article Index

The US attacks Iran again

 

The Iranians have told the Omani government that they would like to work with them. They have negotiations, but

9:47

the Iranians have also said if Oman pulls back under duress from the United States, uh Iran will do it alone. So

9:56

Iran is not going to wait for Oman. The decision has been made in Iran that they will for now on control the strait.

10:03

They will take fees, not extraordinarily high fees because Iran wants uh shipping to go through the

10:11

straight. Iran wants the Persian Gulf to be a source of wealth for the entire region and for Iran as well. But

10:19

Iran will also prevent uh hostile ships, naval ships uh from the Israeli regime or the United States from being able to

10:27

go to the Persian Gulf to militarize it once again. 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 it appears that the

1:13

Iranians have uh down Fuji. There are two important ports where

1:23

oil is continuing to come out of the Middle East. One is Yanbu which is

1:30

the Saudi port on the Red Sea and as you said it looks like the Houthis may shut

1:38

down the Red Sea. And that means that the Saudi oil going to Yanboo will not

1:45

come out of the Red Sea. And I would just note quickly that even if the Houthis don't shut down the Babal

1:55

Mandab Strait, which is what closes off or potentially could close off the Red Sea, the Iranians could just attack

2:03

Yanbu and shut down the flow of Saudi oil coming out of Yanbu. And as I said,

2:12

they've already shut down the flow of oil coming out of Fuji. And that's the

2:18

United Arabs, United Arab Emirates port on the sea of Oman that is outside of

2:25

the straight of Hormuz. So just very important to understand the UAE has been shipping probably about 1.7-1.8

2:33

million barrels a day out of Fujara. And that's now been cut off. And it

2:41

looks like the Saudi oil flow out of the Red Sea is likely to be cut off as well.

2:48

So I just wanted to emphasize that those two places, Fujyra and Yanbu really

2:55

do matter. And both are now involved in the mix in a serious way.

[. . .]

Ukraine and the West are growing

33:19

closer and closer together. The West is becoming more invested in the Ukraine war than it ever has been. And from

33:29

the Russian point of view, it's quite clear that what the west and Ukraine together want to do is they want to

33:36

defeat Russia. And the question is how can Russia avoid that outcome.

 

 

the Americans began to violate the deal

3:44

as expected. They refused to hand over Iranian stolen assets. They refused to

3:50

force the Israelis to leave Lebanon. These are all their commitments. They refused to stop threatening Iran. That's

3:56

a part of the deal. They expanded sanctions, another violation. They

4:02

reversed the lifting of the sanctions of Iranian oil exports, another

4:07

violation of the deal. And so in in general they were

4:14

doing the only thing that they left was the siege. There was no siege. they

4:20

wanted to be able to take the oil but prevent Iran from being able to

4:27

benefit from them. And then they of course opened up this corridor which was

4:32

in violation of article 5 because they wanted to undermine Iran's authority over this trade which was

4:40

recognized in article 5 of the so for a couple of weeks Iranians kept warning

4:46

the Americans. They warned tankers not to go use the American corridor. But the

4:52

countries that assisted the United States in the war, the Saudis, the Qataris, the Emiratis, they would send

4:58

their tankers through that corridor. In other words, they were trying to undermine Iran alongside the United

5:03

States. So ultimately Iran had to after warning tankers repeatedly, they struck

5:09

a number of tankers and the Americans bombed Iran, which of course is another violation. So article 5 was

5:16

violated because the Americans opened up their own corridor in violation of the agreement and then of course they bombed

5:23

Iran and now they've shut the straight through a siege. So every every

5:29

element of the MoU has been undermined by the Americans. The objective of the Americans, of

5:35

course, was to, since they lost the four 40-day war, the Ramadan war, they

5:40

lost the siege warfare, they lost at the negotiating table. What Trump was

5:45

trying to do was trying to undermine the MoU and win the war through

5:52

cheating the Iranians. So, they would refrain from carrying out their

5:57

obligations. they would take control of the straight of Hormuz

 

Iran was simply following the protocols that it had established in accordance with MoU.

5:00

I think it's it's vitally important that people around the world understand that

5:05

the paragraph five in the MoU gave Iran the only authority, didn't

5:12

identify the United States or Oman or any other Gulf country that it was only

5:18

Iran that had the responsibility for ensuring the safe passage of ships through the straight of Hormuse and in

5:26

in conjunction with that Iran prepared, set up, the Persian Gulf Strait

5:31

Authority and and provided the protocols that ships are to follow. Provide us the name of your captain, the

5:38

name of the ship, the owner of the ship, the destination of your cargo, and

5:43

what are the names of the sailors on board, what are the nationalities, fill

5:49

that, file that in advance and you can go. But Iran also stipulated in those protocols, any ship that does not adhere

5:56

to these will be met with force. So when Iran tried to enforce those protocols,

6:02

the United States took it upon himself, said, "Well, we're not going to allow that” and attacked Iran, which was a

6:09

violation of paragraph one of the MoU. So Iran responded.

[. . .]

the Iranian people want. They want revenge.

26:47

And the the last written message from Mutaba Kami basically endorsed that.

26:55

So Iran's in no mood. They're not looking. They're no

27:01

consiliation among them right now. including with Galibuff. You know

27:06

there have been some criticisms of Assange and Galibuff among some of the population accusing them of being way

27:12

too soft, way too lenient in dealing with the United States. But both

27:17

have been out in public of late making it clear that you know, if you

27:23

will, the the opportunity for negotiation is passed. Iran is going to press

27:29

forward and they made it very clear in the release last week if the United States proceeds with these attacks

27:36

they are going to close the Babel Mandab they will reappraise re-evaluate their

27:43

nuclear doctrine and they will withdraw from the NPT. So those are sort of the

27:48

benchmarks to keep an eye on. When we see that happen then that lets us know that you know Iran is moving

27:56

forward in that direction.

[. . .]

 When a CIA report claimed some Chinese

31:40

ship had chemical weapons or some weapons of mass destruction on board,

31:46

the US tried to stop it. The Chinese said no. And so, the US literally turned off the GPS. So this this ship no longer

31:54

had the ability to navigate other than going back you know to compass

32:00

and a sextant. So it showed that the the US by controlling GPS could

32:07

control the Chinese fleet at the time. So China said ah we've learned an

32:13

important lesson here. We got to have our own system which they developed the BYU and now they have it. It

32:24

is a GPS system. Is actually more accurate than GPS. And Iran adopted that

32:31

because previously back in the 12-day war, Iran was still using GPS targeting on its missiles and it wasn't widely

32:39

known at the time, but the United States and Israel were able to spoof or give those, you know, put false GPS

32:47

coordinates into those missiles to take them off course where they didn't

32:52

hit their targets. That's now not the problem. Now they're highly accurate and they're hitting and it's because of the

32:59

Chinese system. So you've gota, I put all that in background, just to say that

33:04

this the entire face of this war has changed in a way that is very

33:10

disadvantageous to the west.

Log in to comment
Per Hanson replied the topic:
9 months 3 weeks ago
Follow the money!

As he boarded the night train to Ukraine,  Boris Johnson  had the usual entourage of aides and bodyguards – plus the man who had given him £1m

Less than a year had passed since Johnson accepted what is thought to be the largest donation ever to an individual MP. It was from Christopher Harborne, one of the UK’s biggest and most private political donors.

Harborne, whose millions helped bankroll Brexit, made the payment to a private company Johnson set up after resigning as prime minister. Now leaked files show that Johnson, a champion of Ukraine in office and since, was accompanied in September 2023 by his benefactor on a two-day visit that included meetings with top officials.

www.theguardian.com/politics/2025/oct/10/the-1m-man-why-did-boris-johnson-take-his-donor-to-ukraine

Editor replied the topic:
8 months 2 weeks ago
Vast amount of money lost to corruption!

the latest revelation has been a hundred million dollar payback scheme that was engineered by one of Zelinsky's close associates. And when that came up, that was about a week ago, maybe two week almost two weeks ago, it it was brought by the Ukrainian anti-corruption investigators and they have been put into gear mainly because of pressure by the United States. So, so that's kind of the tip of the iceberg. That that's just small potatoes because if we look at the total amount of money that's been pumped into Ukraine since 2022, it's about $360 billion. And out of that, I estimate that the corruption's running be somewhere between 15 and 30% of that. Probably towards the 30% line. That's what the auditors found with the involvement in the United States in Afghanistan. The corruption was running at 30% in Afghanistan. I think it's probably pretty close to that in Ukraine. So we're talking Mike about big bucks. We've got at 15% of the corruption money go lining the pockets of the of the corrupt 54 billion and at 30% it would be 108 billion.

Editor replied the topic:
8 months 2 weeks ago
Kick-backs?

The European leaders are ignorant and are the puppets of NATO. They are too stupid to see that the Neocons are manipulating them. This nonsense that Ukraine should not be split is insane. That was the ONLY way to stop the ethnic killing in Yugoslavia. Czechoslovakia split in two as well. The Minsk Agreement, which even Germany signed, was to allow the Donbas to vote. Merz refusal to honor the word of Germany is dooming Europe to World War III. If they reall want peace, surrender the Donbas. Else, then sacrifice all of Europe to a third world war. There will NEVER be peace with Russia because people like Kallas hate the Russian people.

The only way for Europe to avoid this war is to stand up and demand that they have a say in creating war. European leaders will lie and put Europe at risk for Ukraine, the most corrupt nation on Earth. Zelensky’s Chief of Staff is now implicated in stealing $100 million. How musch more money will the West hand these people to stuff in their private accounts. They never get enough. Are they paying kickbacks to NATO and Europeans leaders?  

www.armstrongeconomics.com  - Is European Leaders Being Manipulated by NATO?

Editor replied the topic:
8 months 2 weeks ago
The destruction of Europe

War is a great way to default on debts. You get to form a new government, and they always disavow the debts of the previous government. Europe has been committing economic suicide. Between the COVID-19 Lockdowns, the NET-ZERO Climate Change, and then the sanctions on Russia that doubled their fuel costs, you could not ask for a more brain-dead group of politicians who have ZERO comprehension of even how the economy functions.

www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/war/boris-johnson-urges-ukraine-to-continue-war


Advertisement:

Information

Cookies user preferences
We use cookies to ensure you to get the best experience on our website. If you decline the use of cookies, this website may not function as expected.
Accept all
Decline all
Read more
Analytics
Tools used to analyze the data to measure the effectiveness of a website and to understand how it works.
Google Analytics
Accept
Decline
Google Analytics
Accept
Decline
Advertisement
If you accept, the ads on the page will be adapted to your preferences.
Google Ad
Accept
Decline
Save